A Day Fit for Kings

By:  Ben
March 12, 2010


The first clue that this was not the Wasatch, nor Tuckerman: there had been some wind out of the NW through here recently.

As we climbed, Greg and I noticed a beautiful line off to the side of the skintrack. Winding its way down through a narrow slot in improbably balanced rocks, this line had it all – alpine scenery, rad steepness, and all the silliness that a 200 foot line that is only skiable when the wind blows from the wrong direction can have. Naturally we skied it. Here’s the view from the top.

(Click here to have get a bigger view.)

Greg about to drop in for the maybe-FD, wrestling with his inner demons
Greg

Call it the Petrics-Peters Cooler. Soon to be the most sought after line in the entire Presidential Range.

Another possible name: The Guillotine. I narrowly avoided losing my head.


Continue Reading: «Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Read about the author:   Ben
Enjoy this TR? Read another: TR: Sl(r)ed Rocks

Related Stuff:

  1. TR: A Day Fit for Kings

28 Comments

  1. Greg
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 7:16 am  
    1

    Beyond excellent Ben… incredible. Definitely worth the wait XP

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  2. Evan
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 9:13 am  
    2

    Petricks-Peters Cooler? I was thinking something like Butta’s Blogg Flogger. Either way nice line.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  3. Paul
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 1:07 pm  
    3

    Not fair that you guys/gal have all the fun. Thanks for the pics. Great to view while at work.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  4. ml242
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 1:58 pm  
    4

    hey, who posted and made you guys the kings of new hampshire?

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  5. K_C
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 2:31 pm  
    5

    Nice line and nice pics! Too bad you had the Xtreme gaper with you – did he tumble down the bootpack and take everyone out along the way?

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Ben
      wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 2:34 pm  
      6

      Ya, we really had to babysit that one. first he booted all the way up the skintrack, then he beatered down the headwall while trying to ride it switch to the road.

      Most egregiously he failed to get apres-ski beers from the overly religious gas station owner who chooses not to sell beer…

    • Anonymous
      wrote on June 23rd, 2010 at 11:53 pm  
      7

      I believe you mean most eGREGiously

  6. Patrick
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 4:19 pm  
    8

    Nice work! Though, as you admit, it’s a little hard to believe no one’s skied that. 4500 vertical must be nearly the most continuous vertical descent one can ski in the East however–since Mt W to Pinkham is only 4300!

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Greg
      wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 4:24 pm  
      9

      MTW to the Glen House is a bit more than 4500 I believe.

    • Ben
      wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 4:36 pm  
      10

      yep! Baxter Peak to Abol Bridge is 4640′ – but even if you skied off the west side of the mountain instead of the usual north/east side, the last mile or two would be pretty flat…

      But ya, 4500′ of relatively good continuous skiing is pretty impressive for the EC!

    • Joanne
      wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 9:34 pm  
      11

      Yah, we figured last weekend that the descent was probably the longest one on the east coast… Glad you got into one of the many new lines!

  7. christian
    wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 4:54 pm  
    12

    man, tucks looks like crap this year…the pee pee cooler looks sick, can’t wait to falling-leaf that thing.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Greg
      wrote on March 12th, 2010 at 5:03 pm  
      13

      You’d gape that thing in your jester hat dude.

  8. Sam
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 6:43 am  
    14

    not a first descent. I skied it once in the early 1980’s on skinny skis and leather tele boots. So what if I wasn’t born yet.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  9. Allen
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 7:05 am  
    15

    You guys should come to the Himalayas, plenty of FD’s for the taking.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  10. noel
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 11:57 am  
    16

    it’s too bad I tracked out your line in the great gulFIE the day before.Nice pictures. I can see my tracks from tuesday.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Greg
      wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 5:27 pm  
      17

      Actually not. We noticed the previous party neglected to ski the pow far skiers left. What were you guys thinking going dead middle? Best snow was on the corners!

  11. EO
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 11:24 am  
    18

    Definitely not a first descent. I think some guy over on T4T with infinitely more soul and coreness skied it first.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Ben
      wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 11:27 am  
      19

      I thought that was a given!?
      I mean, we are AT skiers, therefore we are bereft of soul. I don’t think it’s possible for us to have fun even if we tried with our heels locked up all the time.

  12. samthamandaddy
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 4:24 pm  
    20

    eXCELLENT BEN—–YOU GUYS HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB WITH THIS!!!

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
  13. Jonathan Shefftz
    wrote on March 13th, 2010 at 4:54 pm  
    21

    “4500 vertical must be nearly the most continuous vertical descent one can ski in the East”
    — Close, but not quite: the max is 5100′ from Mt W summit to Dolly Copp. (A critical part of the route — allowing it to be a continuous descent — just happens to be in one of the pictures in this TR, which is why my partner brought this TR to my attention.) We skied it March 13, 2005, although I’m sure it’s been skied before and since. (Everything up there has to have been skied a zillion times — doing anything original on that mountain is pretty much impossible.) The only route I can think of that offers a greater vertical drop would be from the summit to Jackson — this is continuously skiable, but unfortunately would require a small ascent mixed in with the descent. I’ve tried to map and scout out some continuous descents to Jackson, but unfortunately they would seem to require absolutely heinous bushwhacks.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • Greg
      wrote on March 14th, 2010 at 3:55 pm  
      22

      we almost called the website famous internet heinous bushwhackers… i’m not sure we get that part of what we do across well enough on here.

      I’m fairly convinced that–even if I’ve never skied a turnbacker line (in which a friend “turnsback” because it’s too gnar)–I’ve bushwhacked a few turnbacker thickets

  14. Anonymous
    wrote on March 15th, 2010 at 11:25 am  
    23

    Nice pics! Great ski lines everywhere. Nice to see a different aspect skied. Hmnnnn…… looks like a piece of the Auto Road showing in the,”…Monroe looking south picture” in far left? Clue!

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
    • christian
      wrote on March 15th, 2010 at 5:53 pm  
      24

      wow

  15. mason
    wrote on March 17th, 2010 at 7:56 am  
  16. mason
    wrote on March 18th, 2010 at 8:29 am  
  17. Doug
    wrote on May 25th, 2013 at 10:48 am  
    28

    Funny stuff. Great photos as usual. Come down to seacoast NH some winter (every third February) and ski the Stratham “Alps” with us. Look out free-heeling is infectious.

    Respond to this comment/comment thread
Please consider visiting our sponsors.

Leave a Reply

(no login required)

Check for email notifications of new comments (valid email required)        

Stay in touch: Click here to follow us on Twitter. Click here to subscribe for updates to be delivered via RSS. Click here to become a fan on Facebook. Click here to read and share real time weather observations. Learn more over at the account. It's awesome. We promise!