Oddest of all, these “blind spots” are the corners with which we seem to be most intimate, and which we can never avoid: time and space…
…intelligence and logic itself.
The implications of “unblinding” these corners are severe. Minkowski spacetime cast serious doubt on free will. Wittgenstein seems to conclude that determinism reigns. Hofstadter pronounces that Mechanism is certain.
But how do they explain this? I can’t reconcile my experience of such fleeting moments with a Williams-esque “absolute conception of reality.”
Augustine and Aristotle’s “Ever Shrinking Present” arguments against the existence of time itself don’t float here. They submerge.
These are extant instants, at least to me.
Oh, and yes, I know that’s not the proper superlative form of fugacious. I just liked how silly it sounded.
References:
Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, 397, “Confessions.”
Hofstadter, Douglas and Emmanuel Sander, 2013, “Surfaces and Essences.”
Lucas, J.R., “Time and Reality,” talk delivered 11.02.2009, Oxford.
Minkowski, Hermann 1908/9, Raum und Zeit, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10: 75–88.
Williams, Bernard, 1995, “Making Sense of Humanity.”
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953, “Philosophical Investigations.”
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
|
|||
Home |
robrox
wrote on November 24th, 2014 at 12:36 pmAh, that moment when the snowflake slices and is sliced, when the heart is between contraction and release, or release and conctraction, when the mind is both all-seeing and oblivious.
Double Fun!
Peter
wrote on November 24th, 2014 at 6:35 pmI’m planning on skiing all this pow tomorrow!11eleven! so excited.
Anonymous
wrote on November 24th, 2014 at 9:18 pmWow an amazing return to the white room this November. Nicely done
Charles
wrote on November 26th, 2014 at 10:08 amWell said, maybe a string is better, keep searching!
bushman
wrote on November 29th, 2014 at 11:33 pmfugacious: auditory term for phish-phish-phishing as one slices VTah powder in November. well-deserved shots Greg